PEOPLE FOR SAFE VACCINES

The New Arbiter in Town

There is a push for two covid-19 vaccines, AstraZeneca and Pfizer, to be granted provisional determination, allowing the manufacturers to bypass many steps that are key to ensuring safety and efficacy, fast-tracking it to the market and into the bodies of Australians. This is an emergency authorisation for drugs that have no long-term safety studies.

Everyone knows how stringent vehicle safety regulations are, and that any report of a malfunction in a car manufacturer's model can initiate a world-wide recall. Similarly, cyber security providers must ensure the highest level of security at all times, and protecting the private data of its users is one of the most critical functions in business and government today.

With cyber security, penetration testing and auditing are required and can never be performed by the company itself. This is unacceptable and would never pass compliance. It must be shown during audits that proper processes have been followed, including thorough testing.

Car manufacturers are forced to perform significant crash testing, completely destroying their own product over and over, learning from its weaknesses, and forced to make improvements repeatedly, at their own expense, until they meet these stringent minimum safety requirements. Their crash test dummies show them how a human would be affected by the accident.

Safety is at the core of these. In fact, it is the driver of everything else in the entire process. And when things go wrong, liability doesn't end with compensation for damage caused, but can include prosecution and even personal liability for Directors.

Living in the western world of bureaucracy, red tape designed to protect us from corruption, and failures in due diligence, is it really such a stretch to question the speed with which our department of health is looking to approve a covid-19 vaccine, when we are clearly in the crash test dummy stage?

If we take the same standards that cyber security and vehicle safety are held up to, with the same implications for failures, and apply them to vaccine manufacturing, would they stack up? The answer is a resounding no.

In fact, unlike cyber security, vaccine manufacturers can still manage to do business at the highest levels with governments, while having extensive criminal records, and they do it without being questioned. How can this be?

Our department of health and its therapeutic goods administration are approving vaccines, made by organisations who have;-

  • known criminal convictions

  • have extremely poor safety studies they often perform themselves

  • have done no long-term safety and efficacy trials

  • been granted immunity from any liability if injuries occur

 

Our governments coerce us into submitting to these vaccines, by "making them as mandatory as possible", using "no jab, no play", "no jab, no pay", "no jab, no fly" and the like. These vaccines are administered without first testing for immediate or long-term reactions and they claim it is for our safety.

Where are the proper checks and measures for vaccine safety? Who is the arbiter to ensure due diligence is performed and people are put above profits?

What must these car manufacturers and cyber security tech giants think of this preferential treatment? And what do you think of being crash test dummies for the pharmaceutical industry?

 

If there is no arbiter, then it must be us, the people. To achieve this we have created a new organisation called People for Safe Vaccines Ltd which aims to facilitate dialogue examining the facts, with a view to ensuring proper science and accountability are returned to this critical matter. It is this company that will take this challenge to Court.

We have already taken the first step by writing to the Department of Health. You can read the letter below.

THE FACTS

  • PFIZER's claim their vaccine is more than 90% effective, but data for the interim analysis has not been peer reviewed or published, making it no more than clever marketing

  • PFIZER's claims are based on only 0.2% of the total group in the trial

  • PFIZER's claims aren't showing their vaccine stops the spread of the disease, only lessening of symptoms and only in those who have covid-19 already

  • On the day Pfizer released its human trial results its stock price increased by 15% and CEO Albert Bourla cashed in 60% of his shares making USD$5million that day. Coincidence, or controlling the market?

  • AstraZeneca have been found guilty of offences relating to

    • off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products

    • making false claims

    • kickbacks and bribery

    • consumer protection violation

    • healthcare offences

    • government-contracting violations and more 

  • AstraZeneca have been fined over US$1.1billion dollars for these offences and violations​, since 2000

  • AstraZeneca human trails have been halted on numerous occassions from several reported side-effects, some severe 

  • Both companies have been granted exemptions from future product liability claims from their covid-19 vaccines

LEARNING FROM OUR PAST

Has our government been wrong on safety before? You bet they have. Remember;

  • Agent Orange

  • DDT

  • Asbestos

  • Glyphosate

  • Plastics

  • Formaldehyde

  • Vioxx

  • Gardasil

After being promised these were safe, it turned out in fact they are responsible for horrendous injuries, death, genetic mutations and cause of environmental damage. It also warrants a mention that "medical errors" is the third leading cause of death, behind heart disease and cancer.

We must take the lessons of the past and apply them here for the safety of the population.

How Can You Help?

 

The concept that these covid-19 vaccines are our only hope of returning to normal life is rooted in ideology, not evidence.

 

We invite you to become a member, to support this vital pursuit to restore common sense, choice and trust when it comes to vaccines.

If you are concerned with having a rushed vaccine imposed upon you and you want to do something about it, join us by becoming a member.

 

Membership fees are from as little as $10 per month. This is your way of contributing to our advocacy of your safety, as arbiters of common sense, so you don't become anyone's crash test dummies.

Copyright © 2020 Advocate Me. All rights Reserved. 

Liability Limited by a Scheme Approved by Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 30 735 541 158 .

  • telegram