When our Health Minister, Greg Hunt, was famously hospitalised after receiving his AstraZeneca vaccine, with cellulitis announced as the cause, in spite of cellulitis being named as a known and fatal reaction, officials claim there is no causal link.
After spending $24 million taxpayer dollars to convince us to take the jab, how this is unfolding is really becoming quite the fly in their ointment with their attempts to overcome vaccine hesitancy.
Apart from the understandable apprehension caused by the lack of long-term safety and efficacy studies, the other reason for vaccine hesitancy is that it is becoming more widely-known that the tool being used as the gold standard for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, the RT-PCR test, is flawed. This became known after the World Health Organization (WHO) issued an information notice in December 2020, followed by a news release in January 2021.
The gist of this notice was to highlight a "problem" where lab professionals were using the PCR tests incorrectly, specifically the cycle threshold was too high and the clinical presentations of the patients were not being considered, when they should be. The effect has arguably led to overstated COVID-19 "cases".
Even the world-renowned director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and chief medical advisor to the U.S. president, Dr Anthony Fauci, is now on record stating "if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, the chances of it being replication competent (infectious) are minuscule." He then states that "a 36-cycle threshold, it is just detecting "dead nucleotides".
In short, if these test specimens are not performed at the correct cycle threshold and not interpreted properly, considering the person's clinical symptoms and disease prevalence in the community, it cannot be relied upon as accurate.
As such, at no stage during the "pandemic" can it be said that any reliable data exists regarding the true number of infections. This is part of the reason why many people feel that we are not having a pandemic at all.
Advocate Me said this right from the beginning, as we knew the inventor of the RT-PCR test, Kary Mullis, said it should never be used to diagnose infectious disease. Even if the test was 100% accurate, which no test ever is, it is incapable of showing infectiousness, and that is a real problem, because political decisions are being made based on this fallacy.
Even though this test cannot show if a person is infectious, a positive result in a person showing no signs or symptoms is being treated as though they are potentially infectious. Asymptomatic is the word they use, and these "case" numbers are being used as the reason to continue operating under a state of emergency.
It would be intriguing to be a fly on the wall at the National Cabinet meeting where this was surely discussed; however, we may never know, because the Morrison government claims that these national cabinet meetings are exempt from freedom of information laws, making them immune from public scrutiny. So, while we speculate, we have to contend with their ongoing restrictions like maddening flies we cannot swat away.
Despite the government's response to a questionable pandemic being likened to using a cannon to kill a fly, our individual and growing collective voice of dissent is continuously swatted away using censorship and defamatory campaigns to discredit and divide. We cannot allow this to continue.
We are expected to accept that a person who dies with multiple pre-existing serious health issues, but tests positive using a flawed test, definitely died from COVID-19, yet when a person is injured or dies after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, it is pure coincidence. Correlation does not imply causation.
It is of grave concern that side-effects of these vaccines may not be getting reported due to this dismissive defiance, for in order to determine the general rule-of-thumb, we must look at the exceptions. If that is not compelling enough for you to question the narrative being promoted - using our taxes - I don't know what is.
What I do know is this: like a cannon being used to swat a fly, their diagnostics, nonsensical rules and restrictions, and now their "cure", are inaccurate, inconsistent overkill that causes immeasurable collateral damage. The only gain is that the fabled fly is now firmly planted in their ointment for all to see.